- #Roboform firefox force save login full
- #Roboform firefox force save login password
- #Roboform firefox force save login free
So everyone should be changing passwords org wise if you stored any of that data in lastpass. Lets say your company is not interesting to hackers, normally, but at the same time you use a large set of websites that an interesting company uses (Like Salesforce), well your company will be grouped in and could potentially see a breech based on associated data.
#Roboform firefox force save login password
If the this data is associated with the password databases and then indexed, they can easily decide what group of data to target first.
This worries me more then the databases themselves. Even though encrypted, with the tools available they can be decrypted at some point in the future.Ĭleartext customer associated data was exfiltrated. Saying nothing of collaboration groups that pool resources and time together. While passwords 15char+ may not be processed in any suitable time that would be justifiable by the hackers (costs), if orgs are not taking steps to change their passwords(all of them) they are at risk.īut with how fast GPUs are now, there are multiple password processing libraries running on RTX4090's now, next-gen hardware will make it better/faster, its just a matter of time before this creeps up and affects some random-ass business that wasn't paying attention to the news or ignored the communications from lastpass. This whole lastpass thing is even more dangerous because the vaults were downloaded and can be processed at any time in the future. Same goes for SolarWinds, Kaseaya, Log4J.etc as lots of uninteresting targets got swept up.
It really pisses me off because MOST of this is 100% avoidable. Most companies would never be in the cross hairs of hackers, but since everything is "Cloud-as-a-service" and that pushes more and more off prem, orgs that are normally not interesting enough became swept up and are targeted as a 'value-add'. This is my main problem with "security" cloud providers. Its more about "are you interesting enough" to be targeted. When it's officially considered stable and supported by them, I think it'll be the best option available for most businesses. It's currently still beta, but it's much easier to administer, uses much less resources, can run on ARM and can also works with Postgres/MariaDB/MySQL. Now, there is this extremely nice recent development of Bitwarden offering a new lightweight all-in-one "unified" image.
#Roboform firefox force save login free
It's also fully free software, but there's no paid support available for it, so you're trading those two things.
Not a big deal if you're gonna deploy to 1000 users and have the extra time & hardware associated with that, but way overkill if it's only gonna be used by 20 people in IT internally.
#Roboform firefox force save login full
For all intents and purposes, it is most of their full SaaS-tier service with all the extra complexity that brings. It needs specifically MSSQL and a whole mess of containers or standalone services that have to be kept in sync, along with some scripts that try to do so. The upstream/official self-hosted Bitwarden enterprise server is a somewhat painful product to run. Not them, but I'd recommend the same thing.
0 kommentar(er)
